Last February I tried something in which I assembled a ‘virtual-team’ to help me review an article (see IAEA Property, Plant and Equipment Framework). Given that this group provided such excellent advise, I thought I would try it again with my next article.
So, a huge note of thanks (and a libation or coffee on me next time I see you) to the following individuals who provided ‘friendly-peer-review’. As in the last go round, the result was a much better article with bad bits beaten out with bats.
Thank you for the Use of Your Brain
Of course no good deed ever goes unpunished and to that end, the following are the folks who have helped me with the friendly-peer-review. Hopefully I can return the favor in the future. Also, if you are on the list and are logging this as professional development, feel free to refer to this post and notice below.
|Anne-Marie A.||Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute|
|Rhonda S.||Andwa Consulting|
|Pam Q.||Athabasca University|
|Catherine S.||Government of Alberta|
|Chad B.||Government of Alberta|
|Darwin B.||Government of Alberta|
|Stacey R.||Government of Alberta|
|Eric S.||Government of Alberta|
|Shakeeb S.||Government of Alberta|
|Nicholas T.||Social Metrics|
To whom it may concern, the above individuals were asked to perform a friendly-peer review of an article intended to be published in the Financial Management Institute of Canada journal, FMI*IGF Journal. The estimated time to perform this review was between 2 to 3 hours. All of the above individuals demonstrated a firm grasp of the subject matter and helped to createnet-new original thought and critique through this peer-review which will be reflected in the final article. I welcome contact if further confirmation is required.