CPA Achievement Award – 2020 Version

This is the second year that I have been able to review the accomplishments of fellow Alberta Chartered Professional Accountants (CPA) through the society’s achievement awards.  Last year, I documented my CPA evaluation criteria, and other than some minor tweaks, am largely using the same scoring method.  

Life is a journey (eastern Austria taken August 2018).

As usual, I am astounded at the energy, volunteer-ethic, work-ethic and innovation of my fellow CPAs – through all stages of their career.  

While reviewing accomplishments of my peers makes me feel a bit tired (how do they find the time/energy), it also always inspires me and makes me proud to be a CPA.   As a way to honour these efforts, the following rubric is provided for full transparency so that anyone can understand how I initially rate the entries.  Initially is the operative word as the discussion of the nomination committee is just as important as the initial rating.   

Evaluating Achievement

There are three awards and the following are my scoring criteria for: Early Achievement, Distinguished Achievement and a Fellow.  Documenting the criteria is my way of externalizing the rubric to self-evaluate as well as share/have-critiqued.  Generally, the scoring is out of 5.0 with the following general assignment which is then modified to match specific criteria:

  1.  Not Applicable.
  2. Met the norms of an average CPA; CPA Award = No.
  3. (1+) demonstrated behaviours above norms but these are not exceptional; CPA Award = Likely No.
  4. (2+) Demonstrated above average but not exceptional behaviours in many to all areas; CPA Award = Maybe.
  5. (3+) Demonstrated exceptional behaviour in one area in particular or strong in many areas; CPA Award = Yes.
  6. (4+) behaviour was far and beyond that expected; CPA Award = Definitely.

A ‘5’ has to be for an individual who is exceptional in a particular criterion and normally are not given out.  The scoring for the criteria is averaged on a non-weighted basis.  The examples provided are intended as a guideline as the evaluation process is in of itself subjective.

Early Achievement Award (EAA)

From CPA-Alberta: The Early Achievement Award recognizes CPAs who have had their accounting designation for 10 years or less and have rendered exceptional service to the profession or whose achievements in their careers or in the community have earned them distinction and brought honour to the profession.

CriteriaDescriptionScoring Range – Guidelines
1. – >2009Received CPA after January 1, 2008.  Time since designation reduces the points assuming that accomplishments of recently minted CPAs are even more inspiring.
  • 1 = CPA 2009 or 2010
  • 2 = CPA 2011 to 2014
  • 3 = CPA 2015 to 2016
  • 4 = CPA 2017 to 2018
  • 5 = CPA 2019
2. – EducationEducation or exceptional professional development.
  • 1 = None (e.g. only CPD)
  • 2 = Other non-credit courses
  • 3 = Related designation (e.g. CBV)
  • 4 = Masters, other post-secondary
3. – VolunteerCommitment and excellence in community or volunteer services
  1. None listed.
  2. Minimum.
  3. < 10 hours/week and/or self-benefiting (e.g. kids, sales, personal passion).
  4. < 15 hours/week, or CPA focused, or selfless, or used unique skills.
  5. (3+) more hours and/or exceptional results.
4. – CareerExcellence, innovation or remarkable accomplishment in one’s accounting career
  1. Undertaken typical tasks as a designated accountant.
  2. (1+) Demonstrated strong leadership, mentoring, client service, etc.
  3. (2+) Supported or was part of the implementation of innovative actions (see 4 below).
  4. (3+) Proposed/implemented highly innovative actions that are clearly innovative and have added significant value.
5. – Time PeriodActivities undertaken or accomplished since graduation.
  1. Expected activities for someone in the 20-30’s.
  2. (1+) meaning above average but not exceptional
  3. (2+) Having completed activities many years in advance.
  4. (3+) Considerable and exceptional activities.
6.1. – OutstandingAre the above activities outstanding or remarkable
  1. Activities are typical or within norms for life position and experience.
  2. (1+) Activities are noteworthy but not necessarily remarkable.
  3. (2+) One or more activities are outstanding.
  4. (3+) the individual has undertaken activities significantly beyond norms and expectations.
6.2. – HonourHonour to the CPA Designation
  1. Activities and actions are those expected of an equivalent CPA.
  2. (1+) Other CPAs would note the advancements to the designation made by the individual.
  3. (2+) Employers and associates would note the value of the CPA designation’s role in the activities.
  4. (3+) Larger society would note the value of the CPA.
7. – AwardsAwards or honorary distinctions
  1. Continues to be a CPA in good standing.
  2. Internal work/volunteer awards inwardly focused; presentation in trade or equivalent magazines.
  3. Award provided in a larger CPA or societal context.
  4. Significant societal, industry or CPA recognition of activities.
8. – Support Letters and Testimonials
  1.  None or only from nominator.
  2. (1+) <2 additional letters, or letters are non-committal.
  3. (2+) <5 additional letters which are strong and verify the nomination’s claims.
  4. (3+) Very strong and compelling letters that provide additional detail and descriptions on the achievement(s).
9. – RoundedWell-Rounded Person, demonstrates a good all-round development as a CPA.  These areas include family, community, work, thought leadership, accounting, etc.
  1. Not provided or person has few interests.
  2. (1+) Young family, work and other interests.
  3. (2+) Family in addition to demonstrating broad personal rounding in a few activities and life focuses.
  4. (3+) Very well rounded and successfully contributes to many areas.
10. – WorkCareer Progression, holds a responsible position at or above what would be expected 10 years in the work place (e.g. senior accountant, manager, etc.).
  1. Holds an expected level/position per education/graduation.
  2. One to two levels above expectations.
  3. Entrepreneur or two or more levels.
  4. Significant senior position many years beyond expectations.
11. – IndustryIndustry currently working in or having worked in for a large portion of their career.
  1. Public Accounting Firm
  2. Consulting Firm
  3. Industry
  4. Self Employed or Start Up Company
  5. Non-profit organization
  6. Public Sector
12. – Score Average of the aboveSUM [1 to 11] / 11 and rounded to 1 decimal place
13. – CommentsRationale particularly for low or high scores.A short paragraph on the individual proving my (working) opinion on whether they have brought honour to the designation or are simply ‘mehh’.

Distinguished Service Award (DSA)

From CPA Alberta, The Distinguished Service Award recognizes members or supporters of the profession who have demonstrated a significant achievement within the last five years and have therefore brought honour to the profession.

CriteriaDescriptionScoring Range – Guidelines
1. – >2014Activities completed since 2014-01-01.0 / 3; binary value.
2. – EducationEducation or exceptional professional development.
  • 1 = None (e.g. only CPD)
  • 2-3 = Other non-credit courses
  • 4 = Masters, other post-secondary
3. – VolunteerCommitment and excellence in community or volunteer services
  1. None listed.
  2. Minimum.
  3. < 10 hours/week and/or self-benefiting (e.g. kids, sales, personal passion).
  4. < 15 hours/week, or CPA focused, or selfless, or used unique skills.
  5. (3+) more hours and/or exceptional results.
4. – CareerExcellence, innovation or remarkable accomplishment in one’s accounting career
  1. Undertaken typical tasks as a designated accountant.
  2. (1+) Demonstrated strong leadership, mentoring, client service, etc.
  3. (2+) Supported or was part of the implementation of innovative actions (see 4 below).
  4. (3+) Proposed/implemented highly innovative actions that are clearly innovative and have added significant value.
5. – MentoringMentor excellence, by significantly contributing to the development of young CPAs or youth in general.
  1. No obvious involvement and/or CPA Recruitment or CPA Offices in an accounting firm.
  2. (1+) Significant firm mentorship and/or leading a CPA Office in industry.  Other equivalent mentoring.
  3. (2+) Testimonials of significant personal impact within a firm; large number or overcoming adversity in mentoring; supporting disadvantaged youth pursue a CPA.
  4. (3+) unique and innovative methods of promoting financial literacy or a career in business, government, self-employment or a CPA designation.
6.1. – OutstandingAre the above activities outstanding or remarkable
  1. Activities are typical or within norms for life position and experience.
  2. (1+) Activities are noteworthy but not necessarily remarkable.
  3. (2+) One or more activities are outstanding.
  4. (3+) the individual has undertaken activities significantly beyond norms and expectations.
6.2. – HonourHonour to the CPA Designation
  1. Activities and actions are those expected of an equivalent CPA.
  2. (1+) Other CPAs would note the advancements to the designation made by the individual.
  3. (2+) Employers and associates would note the value of the CPA designation’s role in the activities.
  4. (3+) Larger society would note the value of the CPA.
7. – AwardsAwards or honorary distinctions
  1. Continues to be a CPA in good standing.
  2. Internal work/volunteer awards inwardly focused; presentation in trade or equivalent magazines.
  3. Award provided in a larger CPA or societal context.
  4. Significant societal, industry or CPA recognition of activities.
8. – Support Letters and Testimonials
  1.  None or only from nominator.
  2. (1+) <2 additional letters, or letters are non-committal.
  3. (2+) <5 additional letters which are strong and verify the nomination’s claims.
  4. (3+) Very strong and compelling letters that provide additional detail and descriptions on the achievement(s).
9. – RoundedWell-Rounded Person, demonstrates a good all round development as a CPA.  These areas include family, community, work, thought leadership, accounting, etc.
  1. Not provided or person has few interests.
  2. (1+) Young family, work and other interests.
  3. (2+) Family in addition to demonstrating broad personal rounding in a few activities and life focuses.
  4. (3+) Very well rounded and successfully contributes to many areas.
10. – WorkCareer Progression, holds a responsible position at or above what would be expected 10 years in the work place (e.g. senior accountant, manager, etc.).
  1. Holds an expected level/position per education/graduation.
  2. One to two levels above expectations.
  3. Entrepreneur or two or more levels.
  4. Significant senior position many years beyond expectations.
11. – IndustryIndustry currently working in or having worked in for a large portion of their career.
  1. Public Accounting Firm
  2. Consulting Firm
  3. Industry
  4. Self Employed or Start Up Company
  5. Non-profit organization
  6. Public Sector
12. – Score Average of the aboveSUM [1 to 11] / 11 and rounded to 1 decimal place
13. – CommentsRationale particularly for low or high scores.A short paragraph on the individual proving my (working) opinion on whether the have brought honour to the designation or are simply ‘mehh’.

Fellow – CPA (FCPA)

From CPA Alberta,  The Fellow of Chartered Professional Accountants (FCPA) will be granted to those members who have rendered exceptional service to the profession or whose achievements in their careers, the community, or in the profession have earned them distinction and brought honour to the profession.

CriteriaDescriptionScoring Range – Guidelines
1. – Merit1st impression of meritorious service/achievements bring honour to the profession
  1. An accountant and citizen in good standing but does not stand out.
  2. (1+) Perhaps worthy of a DSA but achievements are not those of a lifetime.
  3. (2+) Consistent and numerous achievements which in aggregate qualify for a FCPA and/or a few significant and unique achievements.
  4. (3+_ An obvious individual worthy of a FCPA.
2. – EducationEducation or exceptional professional development.
  • 1 = None (e.g. only CPD)
  • 2 = Masters, PhD Education; Sessional Instructor.
  • 3 = Taught at a Post-Secondary Level at least 5 years.
  • 4 = (2 or 3+) Contributed to Thought Leadership in a significant and consistent manner.
3. – VolunteerCommitment and excellence in community or volunteer services
  1. None listed.
  2. Minimum.
  3. 10+ years and/or self-benefiting (e.g. kids, sales, personal passion).
  4. (2+) CPA focused, or selfless, or used unique skills.
  5. (3+) more hours and/or exceptional results.
4. – CareerExcellence, innovation or remarkable accomplishment in one’s accounting career
  1. Undertaken typical tasks as a designated accountant.
  2. (1+) Demonstrated strong leadership, mentoring, client service, etc.
  3. (2+) Supported or was part of the implementation of innovative actions (see 4 below).
  4. (3+) Proposed/implemented highly innovative actions that are clearly innovative and have added significant value.
5. – MentoringMentor excellence, by significantly contributing to the development of young CPAs or youth in general.
  1. No obvious involvement and/or CPA Recruitment or CPA Offices in an accounting firm.
  2. (1+) Significant firm mentorship and/or leading a CPA Office in industry.  Other equivalent mentoring.
  3. (2+) Testimonials of significant personal impact within a firm; large number or overcoming adversity in mentoring; supporting disadvantaged youth pursue a CPA.
  4. (3+) unique and innovative methods of promoting financial literacy or a career in business, government, self-employment or a CPA designation.
6.1. – OutstandingAre the above activities outstanding or remarkable
  1. Activities are typical or within norms for life position and experience.
  2. (1+) Activities are noteworthy but not necessarily remarkable.
  3. (2+) One or more activities are outstanding.
  4. (3+) the individual has undertaken activities significantly beyond norms and expectations.
6.2. – HonourHonour to the CPA Designation
  1. Activities and actions are those expected of an equivalent CPA.
  2. (1+) Employers and associates would note the value of the CPA designation’s role in the activities.
  3. (2+) Larger society would note the value of the CPA.
  4. (3+) Obvious honour worthy of a FCPA.
7. – AwardsAwards or honorary distinctions
  1. Continues to be a CPA in good standing.
  2. Internal work/volunteer awards inwardly focused; presentation in trade or equivalent magazines.
  3. Award provided in a larger CPA or societal context.
  4. Significant societal, industry or CPA recognition of activities.
8. – Support Letters and Testimonials
  1.  None or only from nominator.
  2. (1+) <2 additional letters, or letters are non-committal.
  3. (2+) <5 additional letters which are strong and verify the nomination’s claims.
  4. (3+) Very strong and compelling letters that provide additional detail and descriptions on the achievement(s).
9. – RoundedWell-Rounded Person, demonstrates a good all-round development as a CPA.  These areas include family, community, work, thought leadership, accounting, etc.
  1. Not provided or person has few interests.
  2. (1+) Family, work and other interests.
  3. (2+) Family in addition to demonstrating broad personal rounding in a few activities and life focuses.
  4. (3+) Very well rounded and successfully contributes to many areas.
10. – WorkCareer Progression, holds a responsible position at or above what would be expected 10 years in the work place (e.g. senior accountant, manager, etc.).
  1. Holds an expected level/position per education/graduation.
  2. One to two levels above expectations.
  3. Entrepreneur or two or more levels.
  4. Significant senior position many years beyond expectations.
11. – IndustryIndustry currently working in or having worked in for a large portion of their career.
  1. Public Accounting Firm
  2. Consulting Firm
  3. Industry
  4. Self Employed or Start Up Company
  5. Non-profit organization
  6. Public Sector
12. – Score Average of the aboveSUM [1 to 11] / 11 and rounded to 1 decimal place
13. – CommentsRationale particularly for low or high scores.A short paragraph on the individual proving my (working) opinion on whether the have brought honour to the designation or are simply ‘mehh’.

Leave a comment