In my ongoing effort to remember what I have read, some notes on: Smarter Than You Think: How Technology is Changing Our Minds for the Better, by Clive Thompson. The Penguin Press, 2013.

In my ongoing effort to remember what I have read, some notes on: Smarter Than You Think: How Technology is Changing Our Minds for the Better, by Clive Thompson. The Penguin Press, 2013.

This is the third snowshoe event which has had a bit of a spotty record what with the warm weather. The weather forecast is great -2C with light winds.
There are two inherent tensions when it comes to budgeting: compliance versus cooperation and people versus technology.

This is the third of about twelve snowshoe events I will be running for EBTC. The weather forecast is VERY WARM, -1C with light winds.
I have been able to call upon friends and colleagues twice to help me craft articles. In both cases IAEA Property, Plant and Equipment Framework and LATE the group provided me with excellent advice.
A huge note of thanks (and a libation or coffee on me next time I see you) to the following individuals who provided ‘friendly-peer-review’. As in the last go round, the result was a much better article. The article itself can be accessed through my “Antifragile Strategic Planning: director’s cut” or directly from the FMI website: January 2016.
Of course no good deed ever goes unpunished and to that end, the following are the folks who have helped me with the friendly-peer-review. Hopefully I can return the favor in the future. Also, if you are on the list and are logging this as professional development, feel free to refer to this post and notice below.
|
Person |
Organization |
| Anne-Marie A. | Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute |
| Pam Q. | Athabasca University |
| Stacey D. | Government of Alberta |
| Shakeeb S. | Government of Alberta |
| Peter N. | Retired |
To whom it may concern, the above individuals were asked to perform a friendly-peer review of an article intended to be published in the Financial Management Institute of Canada journal, FMI*IGF Journal. The estimated time to perform this review was between 2 to 3 hours completed in early December, 2015. All of the above individuals demonstrated a firm grasp of the subject matter and helped to create-net-new original thought and critique through this peer-review which will be reflected in the final article.
The above activity meets the definition of Charter Professional Accountant – Alberta’s verifiable continuous professional development. Evidence for this include this web page attesting to the involvement as well as the emails and responses provided to myself. I welcome contact if further confirmation is required.
This is the second of about twelve snowshoe events I will be running for EBTC. The weather forecast is great -11C with light winds.
This is the first of about twelve snowshoe events I will be running for EBTC. Being the first, this one will ease the group (and more importantly me!) in the evening program. The weather forecast is great -3C with moderate WSW winds.
In my ongoing effort to both remember what the heck I have done and to share good ‘pracademic’ ideas, I present a method to track staff training. Hopefully you can use/adapt what you find here and hopefully I can remember how I built it in case I need to do it again in the future!

Are you looking for that perfect Christmas present for someone who likes a combination of history, technology, science and is not too squeamish? If that case, can I recommend that you give him or her some space… err, history?
I love Roach’s style and ‘Packing For Mars: The Curious Science Of Life In The Void’ fills the vacuum left by other science writers. In it, Roach discusses the most daunting aspects of manned space travel. These are not escape velocity, not heat shielding or hostile aliens. The most difficult aspects are things like what do you eat, how do you shit, carnal needs and keep morale up in an environment of bland food, fecal bags, abstinence.
While such challenges may evoke junior high’esque guffaws these are also real problems particularly as space travel increases in duration and may eventually lead to colonization if not more permanent moon or mars bases. Roach focuses how astronauts are selected (including a discussion on whether the smaller and less hungry all female crew might make more sense then their larger male counterparts), the fragile nature of humans trying to attain earth’s escape velocity and can you jump out of a crashing space station.
Roach spends a considerable portion of the book dealing with basic human needs such as hygiene, eating, defecating and making babies. Some key take away messages from this section includes space food tastes horrible and was designed by military veterinarians and had the taste and texture to prove it. The space toilet was worth every penny as it not only beat shitting in a fecal bag but it also likely saved the astronauts from developing nasty e-coli infections from escaped post-digested-veterinarian chow. Also, it is good to plan to periodically pee in space as the bladder’s fullness sensors generally don’t work in zero gravity. Pee collects on the side of bladder due to surface cohesion as opposed sitting on the bladder floor creating the urge to void… ahh, in the void of space.
Making babies in space and having babies has its challenges. The first is how to do it in a gravity free environment with Newton and his pesky third law hanging around. Assuming enough duct tape and foot straps can be found, the second problem is the developing fetus. Evidence is scanty but what there is suggests that the baby would not make it to full term. If the baby did make full term, the ambient radiation exposure may create serious problems outside of the womb.
Like Stiff: the curious lives of Human Cadavers, Roach has written a very approachable book. Somewhat graphic in parts with lots of interesting notes and asides.
It is a maxim that war is bad and peace is good; everyone know this. In his book “War! What Is It Good For’: Conflict and the Progress of Civilization from Primates to Robots” dares to ask the question, is War good for something? The surprising answer is yes with two HUGE qualifications.
The answer is that by allowing for the destruction of moribund civilizations, new civilizations, societal structures and technologies emerged. Because of this, when the smoke clears, the resultant societies are better organized, beneficiaries of technological innovations and wealthier than their antecedents. In other words, Morris’ thesis is that ‘… over the long run, it (war) has made humanity safer and richer. War is hell, but – again, over the long run – the alternatives would have been worse.’ (page 7) [1]
This is the first qualification, war is good for something but only over very long time scales with lots of suffering and misery in the middle bits. To explain this, Morris has four parts to his thesis:
Perhaps unsurprisingly the first part is that war has given humans cause to organize. There is nothing that focuses the mind or the organizational needs of the group than a marauding band from two tribes over. This in turn likely influenced such things as our evolution to communicate and our underlying social nature. As well, as society increased in its organizational complexity, there was an inverse use of force. Thus “If you were lucky enough to be born in the industrialized twentieth century, you were on average ten times less likely to die violently… than if you were born in a Stone Age society. (page 8).
Essentially as rulers of one tribe took over another, they tended to incorporate the losers into larger units of organization. As well, the rulers imposed a monopoly on the use of force – restricting its use to the elite and the government. This is why you are much safer in the twentieth century notwithstanding world wars, genocides and other nastiness.
Morris’ second point is that war has been successful because, well, everything else has failed or faltered in the face of war. Morris recognizes that this is a depressing state of affairs but ‘People hardly ever give up their freedom… unless forced to do so, and virtually the only force strong enough to bring this about has been defeat in war or fear that defeat is imminent (page 9).
Larger societies created by war have in turn become wealthier – over the long run. After the smoke clear, the societies created with bureaucrats to collect taxes, impose laws, enforce contractual relationships, etc.
War is putting itself out of business it has been so successful. ‘… in our own age humanity has gotten so good at fighting … that war is beginning to make further war of this kind impossible.’ (page 9). Historically, war was always an option with a likelihood of success that could be estimated and calculated. In 1914, the Germans and their allies made this calculation and bet heavily that they would win. Four years and millions of lives later, the bet was lost. One hundred years prior to this Napoleon made a similar bet and lost at a Belgium town now immortalized as his Waterloo.
As it turns out archaeologists and anthropologists. Certainly there is always room for interpretation but Morris’s thesis rests and the general consensus of these sciences and fields of study.
Morris does an excellent job inter-twining the current research with a very deep dive into history. This includes are nearest living non-human relatives the great apes. In particular he compares us with the social and morphology of gorillas, chimpanzees and bonobos. As it turns out, chimpanzees are nearest to our temperament and bonobos are perhaps what we can aspire to “Unlike what goes on among chimps, however, bonobo sperm competitions (note, this section dealt with strategies for passing procreation) are almost entirely nonviolent. … Male bonobos win the sperm competition not by fighting each other but by making themselves agreeable to females.” (p. 305).
The second qualification is how do we get out of the ebb and flow of building up societies and then have them torn down by war? While Morris does a great job and seems to have an excellent grasp of the history, biology and connections to make his case. Where he falls down, in my opinion, is the human end game. What he suggests is our way out of war is the singularity. In case you have not heard of this, it is when humans and machines merge and we transfer our consciousness into an uber-computer living out our existence in peace.
Well that is the plan anyway. More than likely, I suspect that once we get there, we will discover that our human instincts for competition will kick in but without the physical outlet. Soon we will have the same challenges but without the benefit of an untimely death – a perpetual cyber hell existence.
Beyond not quite believing the end-game Morris has proposed, another criticism I have of his book is his lack of focus on religion as part of the supporting cast for war. History is full of examples of religion providing the social construct that allows humans to do terrible things to each other. I can understand that Morris may have been a bit squeamish getting into this debate (with real personal risks depending upon which religion you pick on – ask the editorial staff of the French Magazine, Charlie Hebdo), nevertheless he misses an important driver of not only war but also peace as well.
Because of the historic breadth of the subject matter, Morris has done an excellent job providing context of not only war but our current geo-political system in context. This includes the concept of the European ‘Five Hundred Year War’ against the rest of the globe. From 1415 to 1914, Morris explains how European ‘Guns, Germs and Steel’ not to mention organizational skills and missionary zeal, allowed Europe to colonize or dominate most of the rest of the globe. This domination only came to an end when Europe tore itself up in the mud of Flanders and the First World War.
In the end, while I may disagree with this end argument, getting there is well worth the read. As well, this is not a book that glorifies war. Morris takes extreme pains in this book not to minimize the impact war has on the people involved. As well we recognizes that while the spoils go to the victors (the Romans, the Barbarians invading Rome, the invading Muslims, the crusades trying to displace the invading Muslims, indigenous people displaced through colonization, and on and on…) – this should not minimize the suffering of the losers.
[1] All page references are from the Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2014 edition.