This post, one in a series on Results Based Management as applied to government (gRBM), explores the structure of government. It outlines the branches of government and how these branches, described as audiences, have different roles to play in gRBM.
Continue readingThis content outlines the characteristics of effective indicators. Key characteristics include validity, reliability, sensitivity, simplicity, usefulness, and affordability. The discussion emphasizes balancing these traits while considering constraints like materiality and timeliness to fulfill users’ decision-making needs and enhance comparability among indicators.
Continue readingThe post evaluates Results Based Management (RBM) and its effectiveness in strategic planning. It discusses the methodologies strengths and weaknesses. While RBM is criticized for fostering bureaucracy in organizations like the United Nations, it remains valuable if implemented in conjunction with encouraging a high-trust environment.
Continue readingThe post explores the multifaceted roles of democratic governments, emphasizing their evolution from “stationary bandits” to providers of public goods and services. It discusses various responsibilities such as national defense, economic management, law enforcement, and public welfare, highlighting the complexities and challenges faced in governing diverse populations effectively.
Continue readingOrganizations need to pick winners and losers. For example, a government must decide to whether to fund project X, Y or Z; a corporation only has the capital to build asset A, B or C.
Most organizations have developed a portfolio selection and management methodology. There are typically 2 parts to such a process: a set of criterion and a scoring scheme to rank the criteria. In this blog, I want to focus on the second challenge, the scoring.
How does a ‘requester’ know that a ‘submitter’ has provide a correct, complete, accurate and relevant ‘submission’? A framework to evaluate the planning, receipt, and evaluation of submissions.
This is a blog continues the series, ‘The RBM Plan!‘ looking at the challenges and criticisms for RBM. This topic allows an organization to design a RBM program tailored to their circumstances while hopefully escaping the mistakes and errors of other organizations.
Continue readingIn the ‘The RBM Plan!‘, I detailed a number of blogs in a series, this is the third. It is a brief visit to see how the United Nations are doing with their RBM implementation after nearly 20 years of effort and what other organizations can learn from this experience.
The blog introduces Results-Based Management (RBM), emphasizing its significance in public sector reform as outlined in “Reinventing Government”. It discusses the historical context of RBM, its endorsement by key organizations, and the challenges of implementing standardized practices. The focus is on ensuring effectiveness and accountability in public expenditures for optimal results.
Continue readingI am brushing up on a few concepts and processes that I have used in the past and may very well need to use in the future. One concept concerned a business philosophy of Results Based Management (RBM) and a tool RBM uses for project design, the Logical Framework (LogFrame).
Organizational Biology 